This unit studies how conductors rearrange charge in electrostatic equilibrium and how capacitors store charge and energy. It builds directly on electric fields and electric potential: conductors are governed by field and potential constraints, and capacitors are devices designed to create controlled electric fields.
A conductor has mobile charges. In electrostatic equilibrium, the charges are no longer drifting, so the electric field inside the conducting material must be zero. If there were a nonzero internal field, free electrons would accelerate and the charge distribution would not be static.
The electric field inside the conducting material is zero.
If there are no charges trapped in cavities, any excess charge on an isolated conductor lives on its outer surface.
The electric field just outside a conducting surface is perpendicular to that surface.
Charge gathers more densely near sharp points, where the surface curvature is larger.
Proof (Excess charge must be on the surface). Imagine a Gaussian surface entirely inside the metal of a conductor, just below its actual surface, and assume there are no charges inside cavities. Since E=0 everywhere on that Gaussian surface,
∮E⋅dA=0.
Gauss’s law gives Qenc/ε0=0, so Qenc=0. Any net excess charge cannot remain in the conducting bulk; it must reside on the surface.
Proof (Field Just Outside a Conductor). Use a tiny cylindrical Gaussian surface, often called a pillbox, crossing the conductor surface. Let the pillbox have area A on each flat face.
Inside the conductor,
E=0.
At the surface, the field has no tangential component in electrostatic equilibrium, so the only flux comes through the outer flat face:
ΦE=EA.
The enclosed charge is the surface charge on that patch:
Excess charge spreads out on the surface until the conductor reaches a single potential. On irregular conductors, surface charge density is larger where the radius of curvature is smaller. Sharp points can create large local electric fields, which is why discharge often begins near pointed conductors.
For a spherical conductor of radius R carrying charge Q, the external field is the same as if all charge were concentrated at the center:
E=4πε01r2Q,r≥R.
The potential of the conducting sphere relative to infinity is
For two large parallel conducting plates of area A separated by distance d in vacuum or air,
C=dε0A.
The field between ideal large plates is approximately uniform:
E=ε0σ=ε0AQ.
Since ΔV=Ed,
C=ΔVQ=EdQ=dε0A.
Edge effects are usually ignored in AP Physics C unless the problem explicitly metnions them.
Proof (Parallel-Plate Capacitance). For large plates with charge +Q and −Q,
σ=AQ.
The electric field between the plates is approximately
E=ε0σ=ε0AQ.
The potential difference between plates separated by d is
ΔV=Ed=ε0AQd.
Using C=Q/ΔV,
C=Qd/(ε0A)Q=dε0A.
Example. A parallel-plate capacitor has square plates of side 10cm (so A=1.0×10−2m2) separated by d=1.0mm of air. It is connected to a V=50V source. Find the capacitance, the charge stored, and the energy stored. Use ε0=8.85×10−12F/m.
For capacitors in parallel, the voltage across each capacitor is the same and charges add:
Ceq=C1+C2+C3+⋯.
For capacitors in series, each capacitor carries the same charge magnitude and voltages add:
Ceq1=C11+C21+C31+⋯.
Series combinations have an equivalent capacitance smaller than any individual capacitor in the chain. Parallel combinations have an equivalent capacitance larger than any individual capacitor in the group.
Proof (Capacitors in Series and Parallel). In parallel, every capacitor is connected across the same two nodes, so each has the same voltage ΔV. The total charge supplied is
Qtot=Q1+Q2+⋯=C1ΔV+C2ΔV+⋯.
Since Qtot=CeqΔV,
Ceq=C1+C2+⋯.
In series, each capacitor carries the same charge magnitude Q because charge cannot pile up indefinitely on the internal connecting plates. The total voltage is
ΔVtot=ΔV1+ΔV2+⋯=C1Q+C2Q+⋯.
Since ΔVtot=Q/Ceq,
CeqQ=Q(C11+C21+⋯).
Cancel Q:
Ceq1=C11+C21+⋯.
Example. A 12V battery is connected to a network of three capacitors: C1=2.0μF in series with the parallel combination of C2=3.0μF and C3=6.0μF. Find the equivalent capacitance, the total charge drawn from the battery, and the charge and voltage on each capacitor.
First collapse the parallel pair C2∥C3:
C23=C2+C3=3.0+6.0=9.0μF.
Now C1 is in series with C23:
Ceq1=C11+C231=2.01+9.01=189+2=1811μF−1,
so
Ceq=1118≈1.64μF.
The total charge drawn from the battery is
Qtot=CeqΔV=(1.64μF)(12V)≈19.6μC.
Because C1 and C23 are in series, each carries this same charge: Q1=Q23=19.6μC. Their voltages are
These add to Q2+Q3≈19.6μC=Q23, as they must. The smaller series capacitor takes the larger share of the voltage, while in the parallel branch the larger capacitor takes the larger share of the charge.
Charging a capacitor requires work because later charge must be moved onto plates that already have a potential difference. The stored energy is
U=21QΔV.
Using Q=CΔV, equivalent forms are
U=2CQ2
and
U=21C(ΔV)2.
The energy density in an electric field is
uE=21ε0E2.
For a parallel-plate capacitor, multiplying this density by the volume Ad between the plates gives the same total energy.
Proof (Capacitor Energy). When the capacitor already has charge q, its voltage is
V=Cq.
Bringing in a tiny additional charge dq requires work
dW=Vdq=Cqdq.
Integrate from 0 to Q:
U=∫0QCqdq=2CQ2.
Using Q=CΔV gives
U=21QΔV=21C(ΔV)2.
For parallel plates,
U=21C(ΔV)2=21(dε0A)(Ed)2=21ε0E2(Ad).
Since Ad is the volume of the field region,
uE=AdU=21ε0E2.
Proof (Attractive Force Between Capacitor Plates). The two plates carry opposite charge, so they attract. A natural but wrong guess is F=QE, where E=σ/ε0 is the field between the plates. The subtlety: a plate cannot exert a force on itself. The force on the positive plate comes only from the field produced by the other plate, which is half the total:
Esingle plate=2ε0σ=2E.
So the force on the plate of charge Q is
F=QEsingle plate=Q⋅2E=21QE.
Writing E=σ/ε0=Q/(ε0A),
F=21Q⋅ε0AQ=2ε0AQ2.
The same result follows from energy: at fixed charge, U=Q2d/(2ε0A), and the attractive force is F=−dU/dd=Q2/(2ε0A) (the minus sign reflecting that the field pulls the plates together, decreasing d). Both routes confirm the factor of 21.
A dielectric is an insulating material placed between capacitor plates. It polarizes in an electric field, reducing the effective field for a given free charge. If the dielectric completely fills the gap, the capacitance becomes
C=κC0,
where C0 is the vacuum capacitance and κ is the dielectric constant.
For a parallel-plate capacitor filled with dielectric,
C=dκε0A.
If a charged capacitor is disconnected from a battery, Q stays constant when a dielectric is inserted, so ΔV=Q/C decreases. If it remains connected to a battery, ΔV stays constant and additional charge flows onto the plates.
Example. A capacitor has vacuum capacitance C0=4.0μF and is charged using a V0=100V battery. A dielectric slab with κ=2.5 is then inserted to fill the gap, raising the capacitance to C=κC0=10.0μF. Analyze two scenarios.
(a) Battery disconnected before insertion (Q fixed). Initially
With the battery gone, Q cannot change. The voltage drops:
V=CQ=10.0μF400μC=40V,
and the stored energy becomes
U=2CQ2=κU0=2.50.020=8.0×10−3J.
Energy decreases by 0.012J. The dielectric is polarized and pulled into the gap, so the field does positive work on it as it slides in; that energy leaves the capacitor (the slab would have to be held back to keep it from accelerating in).
(b) Battery left connected (V fixed). Now V=V0=100V stays clamped. The charge rises:
Q′=CV=(10.0μF)(100V)=1000μC=κQ,
and the energy becomes
U′=21CV2=κU0=2.5(0.020)=0.050J.
Energy increases by 0.030J. The bookkeeping: the battery pushes additional charge ΔQ=Q′−Q=600μC through the potential V, doing work
Wbatt=VΔQ=(100)(600μC)=0.060J.
Of this, 0.030J is stored in the capacitor and the remaining 0.030J goes into work done on/by the dielectric as it is drawn in (and dissipation). So whether energy goes up or down depends entirely on what is held fixed.
The parallel-plate result is one geometry, but the same method works for any capacitor with enough symmetry.
Proof (Cylindrical Capacitor). Consider two coaxial conducting cylinders of length L, inner radius a and outer radius b, with L≫b so end effects are negligible.
Put charge +Q on the inner cylinder and −Q on the outer. By cylindrical symmetry, choose a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius r (with a<r<b) and length L. Only the curved side has flux, so Gauss’s law gives
E(2πrL)=ε0Q⇒E=2πε0LrQ,
pointing radially outward. The potential difference (inner relative to outer) is
ΔV=−∫baEdr=∫ab2πε0LQrdr=2πε0LQlnab.
Therefore
C=ΔVQ=ln(b/a)2πε0L.
The capacitance grows with length and shrinks as the radius ratio b/a increases. This is the model for a coaxial cable.
Proof (Spherical Capacitor). Consider two concentric conducting spheres of radii a<b, with +Q on the inner sphere and −Q on the outer shell.
By spherical symmetry, a Gaussian sphere of radius r (with a<r<b) gives
Isolated-sphere limit. Let the outer sphere recede to infinity, b→∞. Then ab/(b−a)=a/(1−a/b)→a, so
C=4πε0a.
This is the self-capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere of radius a, consistent with V=Q/(4πε0a) and C=Q/V.
Example. Two isolated conducting spheres, of radii a1=3.0cm and a2=1.0cm, are far apart. The larger carries Q=8.0nC and the smaller is uncharged. They are then connected by a long thin wire. Find the final charge on each sphere and compare their surface fields.
Once connected, the spheres reach a common potential. Treating each as an isolated sphere (far apart, so each keeps its own V=Q/(4πε0a)),
a1q1=a2q2⇒q2q1=a2a1=3.0,
and charge is conserved, q1+q2=8.0nC. Solving,
q1=6.0nC,q2=2.0nC.
So charge splits in proportion to radius. The surface field of each sphere is E=q/(4πε0a2)=V/a. Since both share the same V,
E1E2=a2a1=3.0,
so the smaller sphere has the larger surface field, by the factor a1/a2. This is the quantitative version of “charge density is larger at sharp points”: a small radius of curvature concentrates the field, which is why sharp tips ionize the surrounding air and discharge first (the principle behind lightning rods).
At a conductor surface in electrostatic equilibrium, the tangential component of electric field is zero. Otherwise charges would move along the surface. The normal component just outside the surface is set by surface charge density: