Skip to content

Unit 3: Conductors and Capacitors

Physics C E&M cheatsheet

Open ↗

Loading…


This unit studies how conductors rearrange charge in electrostatic equilibrium and how capacitors store charge and energy. It builds directly on electric fields and electric potential: conductors are governed by field and potential constraints, and capacitors are devices designed to create controlled electric fields.



A conductor has mobile charges. In electrostatic equilibrium, the charges are no longer drifting, so the electric field inside the conducting material must be zero. If there were a nonzero internal field, free electrons would accelerate and the charge distribution would not be static.

  • The electric field inside the conducting material is zero.
  • If there are no charges trapped in cavities, any excess charge on an isolated conductor lives on its outer surface.
  • The electric field just outside a conducting surface is perpendicular to that surface.
  • Charge gathers more densely near sharp points, where the surface curvature is larger.
E=0insideexcesschargelivesonthesurface

Proof (Excess charge must be on the surface). Imagine a Gaussian surface entirely inside the metal of a conductor, just below its actual surface, and assume there are no charges inside cavities. Since E=0E=0 everywhere on that Gaussian surface,

∮E⃗⋅dA⃗=0.\oint \vec E\cdot d\vec A=0.

Gauss’s law gives Qenc/ε0=0Q_{\text{enc}}/\varepsilon_0=0, so Qenc=0Q_{\text{enc}}=0. Any net excess charge cannot remain in the conducting bulk; it must reside on the surface.

Proof (Field Just Outside a Conductor). Use a tiny cylindrical Gaussian surface, often called a pillbox, crossing the conductor surface. Let the pillbox have area AA on each flat face.

conductorsurfaceEE=0Gaussianpillbox

Inside the conductor,

E⃗=0.\vec{E}=0.

At the surface, the field has no tangential component in electrostatic equilibrium, so the only flux comes through the outer flat face:

ΦE=EA.\Phi_E=EA.

The enclosed charge is the surface charge on that patch:

qenc=σA.q_{\text{enc}}=\sigma A.

Gauss’s law gives

EA=σAε0.EA=\frac{\sigma A}{\varepsilon_0}.

Cancel AA:

E=σε0.E=\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}.

Excess charge spreads out on the surface until the conductor reaches a single potential. On irregular conductors, surface charge density is larger where the radius of curvature is smaller. Sharp points can create large local electric fields, which is why discharge often begins near pointed conductors.

For a spherical conductor of radius RR carrying charge QQ, the external field is the same as if all charge were concentrated at the center:

E=14πε0Qr2,r≥R.E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{Q}{r^2}, \qquad r\ge R.

The potential of the conducting sphere relative to infinity is

V=14πε0QR.V = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}.

Capacitance measures how much charge a device stores per unit potential difference:

C=QΔV.C=\frac{Q}{\Delta V}.

The charge QQ means the magnitude of charge on either conductor. A capacitor with plates +Q+Q and −Q-Q stores charge separation, not net charge.

Capacitance depends on geometry and material, not on QQ or ΔV\Delta V separately for an ideal linear capacitor.


For two large parallel conducting plates of area AA separated by distance dd in vacuum or air,

C=ε0Ad.C = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}.

The field between ideal large plates is approximately uniform:

E=σε0=Qε0A.E = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0 A}.

Since ΔV=Ed\Delta V = Ed,

C=QΔV=QEd=ε0Ad.C = \frac{Q}{\Delta V}=\frac{Q}{Ed}=\frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}.

Edge effects are usually ignored in AP Physics C unless the problem explicitly metnions them.

+¡uniform¯eld

Proof (Parallel-Plate Capacitance). For large plates with charge +Q+Q and −Q-Q,

σ=QA.\sigma=\frac{Q}{A}.

The electric field between the plates is approximately

E=σε0=Qε0A.E=\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0 A}.

The potential difference between plates separated by dd is

ΔV=Ed=Qdε0A.\Delta V=Ed=\frac{Qd}{\varepsilon_0 A}.

Using C=Q/ΔVC=Q/\Delta V,

C=QQd/(ε0A)=ε0Ad.C=\frac{Q}{Qd/(\varepsilon_0 A)}=\frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}.

Example. A parallel-plate capacitor has square plates of side 10 cm10\ \text{cm} (so A=1.0×10−2 m2A = 1.0\times10^{-2}\ \text{m}^2) separated by d=1.0 mmd = 1.0\ \text{mm} of air. It is connected to a V=50 VV = 50\ \text{V} source. Find the capacitance, the charge stored, and the energy stored. Use ε0=8.85×10−12 F/m\varepsilon_0 = 8.85\times10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}.

The capacitance is

C=ε0Ad=(8.85×10−12)(1.0×10−2)1.0×10−3=8.85×10−11 F≈88.5 pF.C = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d} = \frac{(8.85\times10^{-12})(1.0\times10^{-2})}{1.0\times10^{-3}} = 8.85\times10^{-11}\ \text{F} \approx 88.5\ \text{pF}.

The charge stored on each plate is

Q=C V=(8.85×10−11)(50)=4.4×10−9 C=4.4 nC.Q = C\,V = (8.85\times10^{-11})(50) = 4.4\times10^{-9}\ \text{C} = 4.4\ \text{nC}.

The stored energy is

U=12CV2=12(8.85×10−11)(50)2=12(8.85×10−11)(2500)≈1.1×10−7 J.U = \tfrac{1}{2}C V^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(8.85\times10^{-11})(50)^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(8.85\times10^{-11})(2500) \approx 1.1\times10^{-7}\ \text{J}.

The field between the plates is E=V/d=50/(1.0×10−3)=5.0×104 V/mE = V/d = 50 / (1.0\times10^{-3}) = 5.0\times10^{4}\ \text{V/m}. As a cross-check on the energy via the field-energy density,

U=12ε0E2(Ad)=12(8.85×10−12)(5.0×104)2(1.0×10−2)(1.0×10−3)≈1.1×10−7 J,U = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2 (Ad) = \tfrac{1}{2}(8.85\times10^{-12})(5.0\times10^4)^2 (1.0\times10^{-2})(1.0\times10^{-3}) \approx 1.1\times10^{-7}\ \text{J},

which agrees. Typical capacitances are tiny in SI units, which is why microfarads and picofarads are the practical units.


For capacitors in parallel, the voltage across each capacitor is the same and charges add:

Ceq=C1+C2+C3+⋯ .C_{\text{eq}} = C_1+C_2+C_3+\cdots.

For capacitors in series, each capacitor carries the same charge magnitude and voltages add:

1Ceq=1C1+1C2+1C3+⋯ .\frac{1}{C_{\text{eq}}}=\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}+\frac{1}{C_3}+\cdots.

Series combinations have an equivalent capacitance smaller than any individual capacitor in the chain. Parallel combinations have an equivalent capacitance larger than any individual capacitor in the group.

C1C2seriesC1C2parallel

Proof (Capacitors in Series and Parallel). In parallel, every capacitor is connected across the same two nodes, so each has the same voltage ΔV\Delta V. The total charge supplied is

Qtot=Q1+Q2+⋯=C1ΔV+C2ΔV+⋯ .Q_{\text{tot}}=Q_1+Q_2+\cdots=C_1\Delta V+C_2\Delta V+\cdots.

Since Qtot=CeqΔVQ_{\text{tot}}=C_{\text{eq}}\Delta V,

Ceq=C1+C2+⋯ .C_{\text{eq}}=C_1+C_2+\cdots.

In series, each capacitor carries the same charge magnitude QQ because charge cannot pile up indefinitely on the internal connecting plates. The total voltage is

ΔVtot=ΔV1+ΔV2+⋯=QC1+QC2+⋯ .\Delta V_{\text{tot}}=\Delta V_1+\Delta V_2+\cdots =\frac{Q}{C_1}+\frac{Q}{C_2}+\cdots.

Since ΔVtot=Q/Ceq\Delta V_{\text{tot}}=Q/C_{\text{eq}},

QCeq=Q(1C1+1C2+⋯ ).\frac{Q}{C_{\text{eq}}}=Q\left(\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}+\cdots\right).

Cancel QQ:

1Ceq=1C1+1C2+⋯ .\frac{1}{C_{\text{eq}}}=\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}+\cdots.

Example. A 12 V12\ \text{V} battery is connected to a network of three capacitors: C1=2.0 μFC_1 = 2.0\ \mu\text{F} in series with the parallel combination of C2=3.0 μFC_2 = 3.0\ \mu\text{F} and C3=6.0 μFC_3 = 6.0\ \mu\text{F}. Find the equivalent capacitance, the total charge drawn from the battery, and the charge and voltage on each capacitor.

First collapse the parallel pair C2∥C3C_2 \parallel C_3:

C23=C2+C3=3.0+6.0=9.0 μF.C_{23} = C_2 + C_3 = 3.0 + 6.0 = 9.0\ \mu\text{F}.

Now C1C_1 is in series with C23C_{23}:

1Ceq=1C1+1C23=12.0+19.0=9+218=1118 μF−1,\frac{1}{C_{\text{eq}}} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_{23}} = \frac{1}{2.0} + \frac{1}{9.0} = \frac{9 + 2}{18} = \frac{11}{18}\ \mu\text{F}^{-1},

so

Ceq=1811≈1.64 μF.C_{\text{eq}} = \frac{18}{11} \approx 1.64\ \mu\text{F}.

The total charge drawn from the battery is

Qtot=Ceq ΔV=(1.64 μF)(12 V)≈19.6 μC.Q_{\text{tot}} = C_{\text{eq}}\,\Delta V = (1.64\ \mu\text{F})(12\ \text{V}) \approx 19.6\ \mu\text{C}.

Because C1C_1 and C23C_{23} are in series, each carries this same charge: Q1=Q23=19.6 μCQ_1 = Q_{23} = 19.6\ \mu\text{C}. Their voltages are

ΔV1=Q1C1=19.62.0≈9.8 V,ΔV23=Q23C23=19.69.0≈2.2 V.\Delta V_1 = \frac{Q_1}{C_1} = \frac{19.6}{2.0} \approx 9.8\ \text{V}, \qquad \Delta V_{23} = \frac{Q_{23}}{C_{23}} = \frac{19.6}{9.0} \approx 2.2\ \text{V}.

As a check, ΔV1+ΔV23=9.8+2.2=12 V\Delta V_1 + \Delta V_{23} = 9.8 + 2.2 = 12\ \text{V}, matching the battery. The parallel pair shares the voltage ΔV23=2.2 V\Delta V_{23} = 2.2\ \text{V}, so

Q2=C2 ΔV23=(3.0)(2.2)≈6.5 μC,Q3=C3 ΔV23=(6.0)(2.2)≈13.1 μC.Q_2 = C_2\,\Delta V_{23} = (3.0)(2.2) \approx 6.5\ \mu\text{C}, \qquad Q_3 = C_3\,\Delta V_{23} = (6.0)(2.2) \approx 13.1\ \mu\text{C}.

These add to Q2+Q3≈19.6 μC=Q23Q_2 + Q_3 \approx 19.6\ \mu\text{C} = Q_{23}, as they must. The smaller series capacitor takes the larger share of the voltage, while in the parallel branch the larger capacitor takes the larger share of the charge.


Charging a capacitor requires work because later charge must be moved onto plates that already have a potential difference. The stored energy is

U=12QΔV.U = \frac{1}{2}Q\Delta V.

Using Q=CΔVQ=C\Delta V, equivalent forms are

U=Q22CU = \frac{Q^2}{2C}

and

U=12C(ΔV)2.U = \frac{1}{2}C(\Delta V)^2.

The energy density in an electric field is

uE=12ε0E2.u_E = \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2.

For a parallel-plate capacitor, multiplying this density by the volume AdAd between the plates gives the same total energy.

Proof (Capacitor Energy). When the capacitor already has charge qq, its voltage is

V=qC.V=\frac{q}{C}.

Bringing in a tiny additional charge dqdq requires work

dW=V dq=qC dq.dW=V\,dq=\frac{q}{C}\,dq.

Integrate from 00 to QQ:

U=∫0QqC dq=Q22C.U=\int_0^Q \frac{q}{C}\,dq=\frac{Q^2}{2C}.

Using Q=CΔVQ=C\Delta V gives

U=12QΔV=12C(ΔV)2.U=\frac{1}{2}Q\Delta V=\frac{1}{2}C(\Delta V)^2.

For parallel plates,

U=12C(ΔV)2=12(ε0Ad)(Ed)2=12ε0E2(Ad).U=\frac{1}{2}C(\Delta V)^2 =\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}\right)(Ed)^2 =\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2(Ad).

Since AdAd is the volume of the field region,

uE=UAd=12ε0E2.u_E=\frac{U}{Ad}=\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2.

Proof (Attractive Force Between Capacitor Plates). The two plates carry opposite charge, so they attract. A natural but wrong guess is F=QEF = QE, where E=σ/ε0E = \sigma/\varepsilon_0 is the field between the plates. The subtlety: a plate cannot exert a force on itself. The force on the positive plate comes only from the field produced by the other plate, which is half the total:

Esingle plate=σ2ε0=E2.E_{\text{single plate}} = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0} = \frac{E}{2}.

So the force on the plate of charge QQ is

F=Q Esingle plate=Q⋅E2=12QE.F = Q\,E_{\text{single plate}} = Q\cdot\frac{E}{2} = \tfrac{1}{2}QE.

Writing E=σ/ε0=Q/(ε0A)E = \sigma/\varepsilon_0 = Q/(\varepsilon_0 A),

F=12Q⋅Qε0A=Q22ε0A.F = \tfrac{1}{2}Q\cdot\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0 A} = \frac{Q^2}{2\varepsilon_0 A}.

The same result follows from energy: at fixed charge, U=Q2d/(2ε0A)U = Q^2 d/(2\varepsilon_0 A), and the attractive force is F=− dU/dd=Q2/(2ε0A)F = -\,dU/dd = Q^2/(2\varepsilon_0 A) (the minus sign reflecting that the field pulls the plates together, decreasing dd). Both routes confirm the factor of 12\tfrac12.


A dielectric is an insulating material placed between capacitor plates. It polarizes in an electric field, reducing the effective field for a given free charge. If the dielectric completely fills the gap, the capacitance becomes

C=κC0,C = \kappa C_0,

where C0C_0 is the vacuum capacitance and κ\kappa is the dielectric constant.

For a parallel-plate capacitor filled with dielectric,

C=κε0Ad.C = \frac{\kappa\varepsilon_0 A}{d}.

If a charged capacitor is disconnected from a battery, QQ stays constant when a dielectric is inserted, so ΔV=Q/C\Delta V=Q/C decreases. If it remains connected to a battery, ΔV\Delta V stays constant and additional charge flows onto the plates.

dielectricpolarizationreducestheinternal¯eld

Example. A capacitor has vacuum capacitance C0=4.0 μFC_0 = 4.0\ \mu\text{F} and is charged using a V0=100 VV_0 = 100\ \text{V} battery. A dielectric slab with κ=2.5\kappa = 2.5 is then inserted to fill the gap, raising the capacitance to C=κC0=10.0 μFC = \kappa C_0 = 10.0\ \mu\text{F}. Analyze two scenarios.

(a) Battery disconnected before insertion (QQ fixed). Initially

Q=C0V0=(4.0 μF)(100 V)=400 μC,U0=12C0V02=12(4.0)(100)2=2.0×104 μJ=0.020 J.Q = C_0 V_0 = (4.0\ \mu\text{F})(100\ \text{V}) = 400\ \mu\text{C}, \qquad U_0 = \tfrac{1}{2}C_0 V_0^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(4.0)(100)^2 = 2.0\times10^{4}\ \mu\text{J} = 0.020\ \text{J}.

With the battery gone, QQ cannot change. The voltage drops:

V=QC=400 μC10.0 μF=40 V,V = \frac{Q}{C} = \frac{400\ \mu\text{C}}{10.0\ \mu\text{F}} = 40\ \text{V},

and the stored energy becomes

U=Q22C=U0κ=0.0202.5=8.0×10−3 J.U = \frac{Q^2}{2C} = \frac{U_0}{\kappa} = \frac{0.020}{2.5} = 8.0\times10^{-3}\ \text{J}.

Energy decreases by 0.012 J0.012\ \text{J}. The dielectric is polarized and pulled into the gap, so the field does positive work on it as it slides in; that energy leaves the capacitor (the slab would have to be held back to keep it from accelerating in).

(b) Battery left connected (VV fixed). Now V=V0=100 VV = V_0 = 100\ \text{V} stays clamped. The charge rises:

Q′=CV=(10.0 μF)(100 V)=1000 μC=κQ,Q' = C V = (10.0\ \mu\text{F})(100\ \text{V}) = 1000\ \mu\text{C} = \kappa Q,

and the energy becomes

U′=12CV2=κU0=2.5(0.020)=0.050 J.U' = \tfrac{1}{2}C V^2 = \kappa U_0 = 2.5(0.020) = 0.050\ \text{J}.

Energy increases by 0.030 J0.030\ \text{J}. The bookkeeping: the battery pushes additional charge ΔQ=Q′−Q=600 μC\Delta Q = Q' - Q = 600\ \mu\text{C} through the potential VV, doing work

Wbatt=V ΔQ=(100)(600 μC)=0.060 J.W_{\text{batt}} = V\,\Delta Q = (100)(600\ \mu\text{C}) = 0.060\ \text{J}.

Of this, 0.030 J0.030\ \text{J} is stored in the capacitor and the remaining 0.030 J0.030\ \text{J} goes into work done on/by the dielectric as it is drawn in (and dissipation). So whether energy goes up or down depends entirely on what is held fixed.


The parallel-plate result is one geometry, but the same method works for any capacitor with enough symmetry.

Proof (Cylindrical Capacitor). Consider two coaxial conducting cylinders of length LL, inner radius aa and outer radius bb, with L≫bL \gg b so end effects are negligible.

abcoaxialcylindricalcapacitor

Put charge +Q+Q on the inner cylinder and −Q-Q on the outer. By cylindrical symmetry, choose a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius rr (with a<r<ba < r < b) and length LL. Only the curved side has flux, so Gauss’s law gives

E(2πrL)=Qε0⇒E=Q2πε0L r,E(2\pi r L) = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0} \quad\Rightarrow\quad E = \frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L\,r},

pointing radially outward. The potential difference (inner relative to outer) is

ΔV=−∫baE dr=∫abQ2πε0Ldrr=Q2πε0Lln⁡ ⁣ba.\Delta V = -\int_{b}^{a} E\,dr = \int_{a}^{b} \frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L}\frac{dr}{r} = \frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L}\ln\!\frac{b}{a}.

Therefore

C=QΔV=2πε0Lln⁡(b/a).C = \frac{Q}{\Delta V} = \frac{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L}{\ln(b/a)}.

The capacitance grows with length and shrinks as the radius ratio b/ab/a increases. This is the model for a coaxial cable.

Proof (Spherical Capacitor). Consider two concentric conducting spheres of radii a<ba < b, with +Q+Q on the inner sphere and −Q-Q on the outer shell.

abconcentricsphericalcapacitor

By spherical symmetry, a Gaussian sphere of radius rr (with a<r<ba < r < b) gives

E(4πr2)=Qε0⇒E=14πε0Qr2.E(4\pi r^2) = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0} \quad\Rightarrow\quad E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{Q}{r^2}.

The potential difference is

ΔV=∫abE dr=Q4πε0∫abdrr2=Q4πε0(1a−1b)=Q4πε0b−aab.\Delta V = \int_{a}^{b} E\,dr = \frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_{a}^{b}\frac{dr}{r^2} = \frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\right) = \frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{b-a}{ab}.

Therefore

C=QΔV=4πε0 abb−a.C = \frac{Q}{\Delta V} = 4\pi\varepsilon_0\,\frac{ab}{b-a}.

Isolated-sphere limit. Let the outer sphere recede to infinity, b→∞b\to\infty. Then ab/(b−a)=a/(1−a/b)→aab/(b-a) = a/(1 - a/b) \to a, so

C=4πε0 a.C = 4\pi\varepsilon_0\,a.

This is the self-capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere of radius aa, consistent with V=Q/(4πε0a)V = Q/(4\pi\varepsilon_0 a) and C=Q/VC = Q/V.

Example. Two isolated conducting spheres, of radii a1=3.0 cma_1 = 3.0\ \text{cm} and a2=1.0 cma_2 = 1.0\ \text{cm}, are far apart. The larger carries Q=8.0 nCQ = 8.0\ \text{nC} and the smaller is uncharged. They are then connected by a long thin wire. Find the final charge on each sphere and compare their surface fields.

Once connected, the spheres reach a common potential. Treating each as an isolated sphere (far apart, so each keeps its own V=Q/(4πε0a)V = Q/(4\pi\varepsilon_0 a)),

q1a1=q2a2⇒q1q2=a1a2=3.0,\frac{q_1}{a_1} = \frac{q_2}{a_2} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{a_1}{a_2} = 3.0,

and charge is conserved, q1+q2=8.0 nCq_1 + q_2 = 8.0\ \text{nC}. Solving,

q1=6.0 nC,q2=2.0 nC.q_1 = 6.0\ \text{nC}, \qquad q_2 = 2.0\ \text{nC}.

So charge splits in proportion to radius. The surface field of each sphere is E=q/(4πε0a2)=V/aE = q/(4\pi\varepsilon_0 a^2) = V/a. Since both share the same VV,

E2E1=a1a2=3.0,\frac{E_2}{E_1} = \frac{a_1}{a_2} = 3.0,

so the smaller sphere has the larger surface field, by the factor a1/a2a_1/a_2. This is the quantitative version of “charge density is larger at sharp points”: a small radius of curvature concentrates the field, which is why sharp tips ionize the surrounding air and discharge first (the principle behind lightning rods).


At a conductor surface in electrostatic equilibrium, the tangential component of electric field is zero. Otherwise charges would move along the surface. The normal component just outside the surface is set by surface charge density:

E⊥,outside−E⊥,inside=σε0.E_{\perp,\text{outside}} - E_{\perp,\text{inside}} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}.

Since E⊥,inside=0E_{\perp,\text{inside}}=0 in the conductor,

E⊥,outside=σε0.E_{\perp,\text{outside}}=\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}.
  1. Temporary placeholder FRQ for wiring/testing — replace with a real free-response question for this unit.

    (A)(A) State one key idea from this unit and explain it in your own words.

    (B)(B) Give a worked example or application of that idea.